W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2002

RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 19:29:51 +0300
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B160B7C@trebe006.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Cc: <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Sergey Melnik [mailto:melnik@db.stanford.edu]
> Sent: 08 August, 2002 18:36
> To: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere)
> Cc: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk; jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com;
> Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com; jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com; 
> w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
> 
> 
> Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> > ...
> > The WG has *agreed* that any deviations from the stake-in-the-ground
> > proposal would be motivated by clear technical and practical
> > considerations -- i.e. fatal flaws or errors in the proposal.
> 
> 
> Can you please provide a URL pointer to the decision you are 
> referring 
> to? I don't recall the exact wording of that clause about motivating 
> factors that you are quoting...

This was the agreement of the WG at the Cannes f2f. I'm sure
it's in the minutes. It's also been reiterated on the lists
a few times. Sorry, no time to dig through the archives just
now...

Patrick
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 07:48:36 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:25 EDT