On 2002-04-25 15:56, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-namespace-change > > Summary: Some changes have been made to the RDF language (deletion of > aboutEach*) and definition of terms (rdfs:domain, rdfs:range). This would > normally call for a change of namespace URI's. If they are not changed, a > strong case must be made. > > Brian If it is in fact decided that the namespaces must change, I propose that there be a single new namespace for all RDF, RDFS, RDFD terms. A common source of typos and confusion for new users is keeping straight whether to use rdf: or rdfs: (and soon even rdfd:) etc. so I think that having a single namespace would be beneficial. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Friday, 26 April 2002 04:06:06 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:36 EDT