W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:49:33 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020426104826.039d1a50@joy.songbird.com>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:09 AM 4/26/02 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>On 2002-04-25 15:56, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-namespace-change
> >
> > Summary: Some changes have been made to the RDF language (deletion of
> > aboutEach*) and definition of terms (rdfs:domain, rdfs:range). This would
> > normally call for a change of namespace URI's. If they are not changed, a
> > strong case must be made.
> >
> > Brian
>
>
>If it is in fact decided that the namespaces must change, I propose
>that there be a single new namespace for all RDF, RDFS, RDFD terms.

I have a lot of sympathy for this idea, and I can't offhand think of any 
disadvantages.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 06:10:05 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:36 EDT