- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:34:39 +0100
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I am sorry this is so late. I forgot! (We might need to delay approval until next week). BRIAN, PAT: note action 19,20,21 (yours and mine) below which Jema lost. Decision 6 was not scribed correctly, and hence not in Jema ============ Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0285.html IRC Log: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2002-04-19 Jema action/decision summary: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0332.html Scribe: Jeremy Carroll Executive Summary: Decisions: 1: Triples should be represented using correct n-triples 2: close rdfs-online-char-encoding 3: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: there will be one 4: rdfs-constraining-containers is out-of-scope and closed 5: rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property, legal, in MT, closed. 6: Do not publish Datatyping WD at this time. >Jema noted the following actions during RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 > >2002-04-19#1: frankm sync up with eric concerning primer >2002-04-19#2: danb review primer, specifically schema stuff >2002-04-19#3: martyn review current primer >2002-04-19#4: pat provide MT WD for wg review >2002-04-19#5: jang review schema WD >2002-04-19#6: aaron review schema WD >2002-04-19#7: frank review schema WD >2002-04-19#8: jos review schema WD >2002-04-19#9: danb make schema WD available on Monday >2002-04-19#10: jan have test cases WD to review for Monday >2002-04-19#11: jeremy review test cases WD >2002-04-19#12: jos review test cases WD >2002-04-19#13: bwm propose how we move forward with datatyping >2002-04-19#14: danc do entailement test case for container with rdfs:contains >2002-04-19#15: danbri propose name for container-membership-superProperty >2002-04-19#16: danbri review effect _NNN-superProperty on primer >2002-04-19#17: pat respond helpfully to rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property raiser >2002-04-19#18: jan produce test case for rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property The following actions were lost by Jema, but still in IRC log. 2002-04-19#19: brian accept chance to review charmod 2002-04-19#20: jjc review charmod by 31st May 2002-04-19#21: path review charmod by 31st May (Exact wording of decisions: >1: Triples should be represented using correct n-triples >2: close rdfs-online-char-encoding >3: resolve that there will be common superproperty >4: agreed propsoal in agenda 15 >5: agree resolution in agenda item 16 ) DETAIL ====== * 1: Allocate scribe jjc (first bit gk) * 2: Roll Call Present: Martin Horner Frank Manola Aaron Swartz Patrick Stickler Jos De Roo Graham Klyne Dan Connolly Jan Grant Ron Daniel Brian McBride Jeremy Carroll Regrets: Steve Petschulat Dave Beckett Mike Dean Eric Miller * 3: Introduce Observers HP Observers: - Andy Seaborne and three students: Alex, Olu, Tim. * 4: Review Agenda * 5: Next telecon 10am Boston time, 26 Apr 2002 * 6: Review Minutes of 2002-04-12 * See: * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0166.html Approved after brief discussion. * 7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions Confirmed: [[[ ACTION: 2002-04-05#4 Brian sort out who will write text for updating test cases wd ACTION: 2002-04-12#5 aaron write up datatyping use-case for Dublin Core see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0168.html ACTION: 2002-04-12#7 jjc post message to rdfcore with motivating example for dark triples? see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0178.html ]]] * 8: outstanding issues (See agenda for list) * 9: Review of CharMod last call #2 2002-04-19#19: brian accept chance to review charmod 2002-04-19#20: jjc review charmod by 31st May 2002-04-19#21: path review charmod by 31st May Strong preference for review to be significantly earlier. * 10: Schedule and document status * Primer >2002-04-19#1: frankm sync up with eric concerning primer >2002-04-19#2: danb review primer, specifically schema stuff >2002-04-19#3: martyn review current primer Generally favourable comments have been made. * Syntax No discussion. * Model Theory >2002-04-19#4: pat provide MT WD for wg review By 26th April? The next WD should be the one before last call. * Schema >2002-04-19#5: jang review schema WD >2002-04-19#6: aaron review schema WD >2002-04-19#7: frank review schema WD >2002-04-19#8: jos review schema WD >2002-04-19#9: danb make schema WD available on Monday Last call schedule unclear. Friday 26th is last date for us to approve WD before publishing moratorium in May. * Test cases >2002-04-19#10: jan have test cases WD to review for Monday >2002-04-19#11: jeremy review test cases WD >2002-04-19#12: jos review test cases WD * F2F in June: * Does the WG believe it would be good to meet, Yes it does. * 11: How to represent triples in documents. DECISION 1: Triples should be represented using correct n-triples. * 12: Datatyping WD * Is this document ready for first publication? Are the editors agreed? The editors are not agreed. DECISION 6: Do not publish Datatyping WD at this time. >2002-04-19#13: bwm propose how we move forward with datatyping * 13: Issue: rdfs-online-char-encoding * Propose: * o action Eric to update the schema file with the appropriate character encoding declaration * o close this issue Hasty looking at file. It seems to be OK. DECISION 2: Close rdfs-online-char-encoding. * 14: Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty DECISION 3: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: there will be one. Discussion included: - entailment works one but not the other. >2002-04-19#14: danc do entailement test case for container with rdfs:contains - rdf:member or rdf:contains >2002-04-19#15: danbri propose name for container-membership-superProperty >2002-04-19#16: danbri review effect _NNN-superProperty on primer * 15: Issue: rdfs-constraining-containers [[[ Propose: o the WG resolves that expressing such a constraint is beyond the scope of RDFS. Such functionality belongs with more powerful ontology languages such as daml+oil and owl. o The WG notes that DAML+OIL can express this constraint as described in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0106.html o The WG closes this issue ]]] DECISION 4: proposal agreed. 16: Issue: rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property [[[ Propose the WG resolves: o an instance of the Property class may have an rdfs:subClassOf property o the meaning of such a property is defined by the model theory o this issue be closed ]]] DECISION 5: proposal agreed. Discussion that resolution is unhelpful. >2002-04-19#17: pat respond helpfully to rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property raiser >2002-04-19#18: jan produce test case for rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property * 17: daml:collection Small amount of discussion but time runs out. Meeting adjourned. * 18: Issue: rdf-charmod-resources Not reached. * 19: Suggest after hours discussion of dark triples Suggestion was followed (profitably!).
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 05:35:15 UTC