- From: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:40:00 +0200
- CC: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Ronald Daniel wrote: > > Pat Hayes said: > > > I know Im going back on what I said before, but now I > > see all the examples (congrats on those, BTW) I find the closeness of > > rdfd:datatype and rdfd:Datatype rather anxiety-producing. (Does > > anyone else agree?) > > Yes, massively. > Lets make it easy to tell things apart, please. > > (Thanks for mentioning this BTW) ...and another vote for this. I found that the most confusing aspect of this otherwise excellent document (and very difficult to explain to others). (Another minor comment for the heap: the paragraph after the first diagram in 3.4.2 (Datatype clashes) has me confused. Either it is opaquely written or you really have Jane and Judy confused (as well as me)) -- Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com> Profium, Les Espaces de Sophia, Immeuble Delta, B.P. 037, F-06901 Sophia-Antipolis, France Tel. +33 (0)4.93.95.31.44 Fax. +33 (0)4.93.95.52.58 Mob. +33 (0)6.21.01.54.56 Internet: http://www.profium.com
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 04:40:15 UTC