RE: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings

>
> To conclude that Jenny's ex:age is ten would be a mistake, an invalid
> inference. We should make this painfully clear to users, so they do
> not get their RDF in a muddle.
>

Smell the coffee!

The WG did agree at the f2f that the lack of "jeremy's entailment" was an
issue.

Pat is speaking wisdom here. "jeremy's entailment" cannot possibly hold if
Jenny's ex:age is the string "10".

The WG can't have its tidiness cake and eat it.

Carping from the sidelines

Jeremy

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 05:00:25 UTC