W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:45:47 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020411194349.00a8a1d8@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 14:33 11/04/2002 -0400, Eric Miller wrote:
>At 06:06 PM 4/11/2002 +0100, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com wrote:
>
>>5: Review Minutes of 2002-03-22
>>
>>See:
>>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0112.html
>
>I ran into a couple ambiguities while compiling these minutes; this 
>message is intended to flag these (and hopefully address them) prior to 
>tomorrows meeting in order to save valuable teleconference time.
>
>---
>
>7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions
>
>...
>
>STATUS: Confirmed
>
>(Note: recalling this from memory, irc log does not support this one way or
>another)

There was one action not confirmed: 2002-03-22#4 which has now been completed.


>---
>
>11: Approve Test Cases
>
>...
>
>ACTION: 2002-04-05#11 josd
>   ping pat, danc to look at rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics tests
>
>DECISION:
>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/
>approved
>
>(Note: the above ACTION and DECISION seem to be in conflict?)

The decision was to approve the test case, but to have pat and danc check 
the fine print, so your record is accurate.


>---
>
>I believe re #7, all withdrawn actions we're indeed confirmed and with #11 
>the test case was indeed agreed upon, thus freeing Jos of the assigned 
>action.  Brian (as you memory seems much better than mine :), can you confirm?

Thanks for taking the time to check this out.

Brian
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 14:48:00 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:26 EDT