- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:49:40 +0200
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Patrick is "fully versed in XML 1.0". One minor point, you use local entity defs to simulate qnames in attr values. This is quite cute, but does go against this para in M&S: [[[ Note: Schema developers may be tempted to declare the values of certain properties to use a syntax corresponding to the XML Namespace qualified name abbreviation. We advise against using these qualified names inside property values as this may cause incompatibilities with future XML datatyping mechanisms. Furthermore, those fully versed in XML 1.0 features may recognize that a similar abbreviation mechanism exists in user-defined entities. We also advise against relying on the use of entities as there is a proposal to define a future subset of XML that does not include user-defined entities. ]]] I am happy to drop the intent of this paragraph - that seems to be a corollary of Patrick being "fully versed in XML 1.0" :). Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 09:42:43 UTC