W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: appeal for (short) test case review

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 12:31:42 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020405123025.03135478@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 00:20 05/04/2002 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
>
> >    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-reification-required/
>
>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-reification-required/test001.rdf
>has unbalanced tags.  Plus using rdf:value is a *bad* idea.
>
>Stylistically, I'd always define node URIs (rdf:about) unless there is a
>good reason not to; but I've left that.
>
>This is OK:
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>          xmlns:eg="http://example.org#">
>
>   <rdf:Description ex:prop="10"/>
>
></rdf:RDF
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>_:a <http://example.org#prop> "10" .
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Updated as per your suggestion.  Also grounded the bnode and fixed minor typo.

I suggest that these two have had enough review and can be approved today.

Brian
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 06:34:04 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:22 EDT