Re: appeal for (short) test case review

>>>Brian McBride said:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> We have some some short/easy test cases we can maybe approve at our next 
> telecon if some folks will look over them:
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-uri-substructure/

tests OK
 
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-reification-required/

http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-reification-required/test001.rdf
has unbalanced tags.  Plus using rdf:value is a *bad* idea.

Stylistically, I'd always define node URIs (rdf:about) unless there is a
good reason not to; but I've left that.

This is OK:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:eg="http://example.org#">

  <rdf:Description ex:prop="10"/>

</rdf:RDF
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_:a <http://example.org#prop> "10" .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



>    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/

Not sure what is being tested.  The N-Triples are right if it is
trying to test that rdf schema properties work like any other
property.  test002 doesn't mention subProperty so how is it testing it?

Dave

Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 18:24:03 UTC