W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

RE: appeal for (short) test case review

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 10:17:54 +0100
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: ""Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, ""Brian McBride" <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, ""RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF9A7EB1B7.F6135054-ONC1256B92.0031BCFD@agfa.be>

> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/
> > Not sure what is being tested.
> I think it might be trying to show in ex 2 a use that conforms to the
> in ex 1.
> If that's the goal then there are a number of mistakes.

The testcase is simply, ***does test001 RDFS entail test002***

I was hoping that that was clear from my message


I've made

( <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test001.nt>
  <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> )
  <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test002.nt> .


The answer is a simply B/W ***yes or no***

> I think we drop this case and return the issue to the list that still
> test cases.

I don't follow that Jeremy

Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 04:18:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:57 UTC