W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

RE: appeal for (short) test case review

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 10:17:54 +0100
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: ""Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, ""Brian McBride" <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, ""RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF9A7EB1B7.F6135054-ONC1256B92.0031BCFD@agfa.be>

> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/
>
> > Not sure what is being tested.
>
> I think it might be trying to show in ex 2 a use that conforms to the
scehma
> in ex 1.
> If that's the goal then there are a number of mistakes.

The testcase is simply, ***does test001 RDFS entail test002***

I was hoping that that was clear from my message
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0006.html

[[[

I've made

( <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test001.nt>
  <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> )
  log:entails
  <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test002.nt> .

]]]


The answer is a simply B/W ***yes or no***


> I think we drop this case and return the issue to the list that still
need
> test cases.

I don't follow that Jeremy

--
Jos
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 04:18:35 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:22 EDT