- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 10:17:54 +0100
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: ""Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, ""Brian McBride" <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, ""RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/ > > > Not sure what is being tested. > > I think it might be trying to show in ex 2 a use that conforms to the scehma > in ex 1. > If that's the goal then there are a number of mistakes. The testcase is simply, ***does test001 RDFS entail test002*** I was hoping that that was clear from my message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0006.html [[[ I've made ( <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test001.nt> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> ) log:entails <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test002.nt> . ]]] The answer is a simply B/W ***yes or no*** > I think we drop this case and return the issue to the list that still need > test cases. I don't follow that Jeremy -- Jos
Received on Friday, 5 April 2002 04:18:35 UTC