W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2001

Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 11:34:36 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010904113231.0352f600@joy.songbird.com>
To: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 08:56 AM 9/4/01 +0200, Martyn Horner wrote:
> >         http://ioctl.org/rdf/ms/rdfms#111  (and #112)
> > "Here, any one of the items listed in the container value for
> > DistributionSite is an acceptable value without regard to the other
> > items."
> >
> > In other words, the Alt-collection itself isn't really being considered
> > the value of the property; the members of the Alt are being considered
> > so instead.*
> >
>
>Funny, I'd always read the bag example as `each and every member is a
>student in course 6.001' - that is, the property is distributed over the
>members of the set - not applied to the set. Therefore `alt' is a
>different distribution: there certainly isn't a whole-set/members
>difference between bag and alt - in my mind. Typically, the semantics of
>the properties used are intended for the individual: the use of a
>collection just simplifies the expression. Where does the set
>interpretation come from?

See also:  http://ioctl.org/rdf/ms/rdfms#124, et seq.  (section 3.5)

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2001 14:49:38 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:39:39 EDT