W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Reject change to rdf:value

From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 09:23:57 -0800
Message-ID: <3BDD90AD.CD3180BF@db.stanford.edu>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Dave Beckett wrote:
> 
> >>>Graham Klyne said:
> > I think Aaron said it better.  I don't think this is an issue that should
> > be postponed.
> 
> The issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value
> is recorded as:
>   Suggestion that the rdf:value property be replaced by rdf:toString.
> 
> So I propose that:
>   We reject this suggestion as an unnecessary change
>   ACTION the model theory editor (Pat) to explain what rdf:value means
>   ACTION the primer editor (Eric) to ensure that a description of
>          how to use rdf:value is included.
> 
> Are there any objections to this form of words?

Yes. Datatyping and rdf:value are still subject of discussion. I'd
reword the first ACTION as: to propose an interpretation of rdf:value
for discussion by WG (to my knowledge, Pat is working on it already).

Sergey
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 11:57:26 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:41:16 EDT