W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: A strange question

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:50:53 -0500
Message-Id: <p0510109eb7fe47abe8d8@[205.160.76.193]>
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>At 06:52 PM 10/24/01 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>Hey, the following thought occurred to me. Is it legal to use a 
>>uriref in an RDF triple, where the uriref is the URL of the 
>>document in which the triple appears? In other words, can a piece 
>>of RDF refer to itself? If so, what could it possibly mean?
>>
>>In case anyone is wondering, the issue arises when one starts 
>>playing with Jos deRoo's entailment examples, which have triples 
>>which talk about RDF documents.
>
>Isn't this where we have to be extra careful about use/mention distinctions?
>
>(Echos of Larry's draft:  does it mean the document, the content of 
>the document or something described by the document?)

Right, exactly.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2001 18:50:54 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:41:13 EDT