W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: SYNTAX: RDF/XML Syntax WD work (editorial)

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 22:31:39 +0100
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <5454.1003267899@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>Dan Connolly said:
> Dave Beckett wrote:
> > 
> > I have been working on updating the document
> wow... nifty...
> > Please review
> >   http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Updated-Gra
> >   CVS Revision: 1.63 or later
> editorial/structural suggestions:
>  * the "3. RDF Core WG Issues affecting RDF/XML Syntax" section
>  doesn't seem like part of the specification. I suggest moving
>  it to an appendix.

OK, I've moved it to Appendix A

>  * on the other hand, the references (at least the normative ones)
>  are not appendixes: lopping them off changes what's specified.

Moved be last section before Appendices.

> I like the "Infoset Notation"; especially the way it's
> quite sax-like. Please make the connection to SAX explicit,
> at least by saying something like "this notation loosely
> follows the structure of the [SAX] API".


That is the idea, since it matches what most parsers are written in,
is very familiar to programmers and shows the multi-token context
that is needed for RDF/XML. 

Above changes in CVS 1.64 or later.

Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 17:31:40 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:41:04 EDT