On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 06:59:15AM -0700, Ron Daniel wrote: > Art Barstow said: > > > WRT BC, would it help to define an additional parseType value > > (e.g. "rdf:Literal")? > > BC = "Backwards compatibility"? Yes. > How would parseType="rdf:Literal" differ from parseType="Literal"? Nevermind. I withdraw my suggestion. > We should probably warn people that in the future the number of values > of the parseType attribute will increase, and those values will > probably move to QNames. However, I don't think we need to actually > define a bunch of QNames now. Yes, it would probably be good to add such a warning.Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 10:09:03 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:41:03 EDT