W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: after-hours conversation (#literal-as-resources #literal-is-xml-structure #xmllang #graph #identity-anon-resources #literal-subjects)

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:09:03 -0400
To: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20011016100903.A15202@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 06:59:15AM -0700, Ron Daniel wrote:
> Art Barstow said:
> 
> > WRT BC, would it help to define an additional parseType value
> > (e.g. "rdf:Literal")?
> 
> BC = "Backwards compatibility"?

Yes.

> How would parseType="rdf:Literal" differ from parseType="Literal"?

Nevermind.  I withdraw my suggestion.

> We should probably warn people that in the future the number of values
> of the parseType attribute will increase, and those values will
> probably move to QNames. However, I don't think we need to actually
> define a bunch of QNames now.

Yes, it would probably be good to add such a warning.
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 10:09:03 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:41:03 EDT