W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: RDF draft structure (was: Schedule)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 13:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110141328420.5159-100000@tux.w3.org>
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> >   RDF Schema       normative
> I'd like to make sure our RDF Schema spec is short, sweet and
> easily replaceable by the specification released by the WebOnt
> WG. I think the best of doing this is split out the RDF

The (draft) Web Ont charter does not require them to produce a Schema
language for RDF, nor is it couched in terms of 'replacement'.


> Schema-specific portions of the into a separate draft. As Dan
> Connolly noted, this covers most of RDF Schema. We probably need
> to add some simple definitions of other the RDF Schema terms
> like label and comment.
Received on Sunday, 14 October 2001 13:31:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:52 UTC