Dan Connolly wrote: > Last summer, when I was working on XHTML->RDF stuff (via XSLT), > I wrote up the RDF/RDFS vocabularies in this style: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/07/hs78/rdf-ms > ... > Well, if I did request them, I have forgotten why > and I'm sorry I ever did request them. I have no > idea why they are taking up space in the RDFS spec. > > Please let's get rid of them. Dan, I fully agree with your "strong" opinion and we couldn't wait to already update http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/ more specifically http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/entailment/rdfs-rules.n3 -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 18:57:16 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:40:59 EDT