W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2001

Re: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:34:40 +0100
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDOEEHCCAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>


Art:
> It seems like test1.rdf should be something like:
>
>  <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
>   <rdf:Description rdf:ID="foo">
>    <rdf:value>abc</rdf:value>
>   </rdf:Description>
>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="#foo">
>    <rdf:value>abc</rdf:value>
>   </rdf:Description>
>  </rdf:RDF>
>
> and test1.nt should be:
>
>
<http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and
-about/test1.rdf#foo> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#value>
"abc" .
>
<http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and
-about/test1.rdf#foo> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#value>
"abc" .

I would prefer test1.nt to only have one line if they are identical. The
graph is a set.
A comment explaining the deletion would then be helpful.

Art:
> I also don't see how and error1.rdf directly relates to this specific
> issue.
error1 seems relevant to me. If you replace the occurrences of 'ID="' with
'about="#' then the file becomes legal

That very substitution (done once) is your file.

The test cases as is seem OK to me, and your modification also looks good.

If we are going to delete containers/test004 because it relates to issues we
have not yet considered, we should also delete
rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/test2.rdf, since it relates to
internationationalization issues more than to ID and about. (I will argue
that about should internationalize as well).


Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 10:35:05 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:40:56 EDT