W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: <rdf:li> as a typed node

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:47:26 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011114204608.0452b010@joy.songbird.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Yes, I agree.  This is a rather bizarre case.

(Would it be easiest on implementers to say that the effect of using rdf:li 
as a typednode is undefined?)

#g
--

At 06:39 PM 11/14/01 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>In the resolution of issues
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema
>
>the WG decided to allow <rdf:li> elements as typed nodes.  This was at the 
>time an arbritary decision, made primarily to ensure that there was a 
>definite answer.
>
>There has been implementor feedback that this was not a good decision.
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JulSep/0159.html
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0122.html
>
>The WG will also be considering by Friday issue:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use
>
>where it is proposed to disallow names from the RDF namespace in 
>inappropriate contexts, e.g. rdf:Description not be allowed on a property 
>element.
>
>I propose
>
>   o Use of rdf:li is an error
>   o 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf 
> be deleted
>   o that the test cases for rdfms-rdf-names-use should illustrate this error.
>
>Brian

------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
       __
      /\ \
     /  \ \
    / /\ \ \
   / / /\ \ \
  / / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/___________/
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 16:10:48 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:40 EDT