- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:07:44 +0200
- To: melnik@db.stanford.edu, phayes@ai.uwf.edu
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> > If we are going to use bnodes, I would rather write this as: > > > > _x rdf:type ComplexNumber > > _x realPart _:y1 > > _x imaginaryPart _:y2 > > _:y1 xsd:number "1.0" > > _:y2 xsd:number "2.0" > > I'd prefer this representation too, not doubt. But aren't you confusing data type with property here? Shouldn't it rather be: _x rdf:type ComplexNumber _x realPart _:y1 _x imaginaryPart _:y2 _:y1 rdf:value "1.0" _:y1 rdf:type xsd:number _:y2 rdf:value "2.0" _:y2 rdf:type xsd:number or better yet _x rdf:type ComplexNumber _x realPart _:y1 _x imaginaryPart _:y2 _:y1 rdf:value "1.0" _:y1 rdf:type xsd:float _:y2 rdf:value "2.0" _:y2 rdf:type xsd:float ??? Patrick
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 03:07:56 UTC