W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Proposed issue resolutions

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 19:11:43 +0000
Message-ID: <3BE835EF.5010907@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
CC: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I'm being thick again.  Can someone explain how this works for resources which 
are neither properties nor classes.

Do I need to take this off the quick close list?

Brian


Pat Hayes wrote:

>> On Monday, November 5, 2001, at 12:12  PM, Brian McBride wrote:
>>
>>>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
>>>
>>> on the grounds that it is out of scope of the charter.
>>
>>
>> Umm, it was my understanding that subPropertyOf allowed one to define 
>> two resources as equivalent by doing:
>>
>> foo rdfs:subPropertyOf bar .
>> bar rdfs:subPropertyOf foo .
>>
>> Is this not true?
> 
> 
> Well caught, Aaron.
> 
> Pat
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2001 14:16:34 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:31 EDT