Re: Proposed issue resolutions

I'm being thick again.  Can someone explain how this works for resources which 
are neither properties nor classes.

Do I need to take this off the quick close list?

Brian


Pat Hayes wrote:

>> On Monday, November 5, 2001, at 12:12  PM, Brian McBride wrote:
>>
>>>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
>>>
>>> on the grounds that it is out of scope of the charter.
>>
>>
>> Umm, it was my understanding that subPropertyOf allowed one to define 
>> two resources as equivalent by doing:
>>
>> foo rdfs:subPropertyOf bar .
>> bar rdfs:subPropertyOf foo .
>>
>> Is this not true?
> 
> 
> Well caught, Aaron.
> 
> Pat
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2001 14:16:34 UTC