W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: heading toward datatyping telecon

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:30:57 +0200
Message-ID: <2BF0AD29BC31FE46B7887732114404316216AD@trebe003.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

> Still somehow that does not sit right with my intuitions.  In rdf schema I
want 
> to  say that the value of a property is an integer; after parsing I don't
much 
> care whether is was represented in decimal, binary or hieroglyphics.  rdf
schema 
> is about describing the data model, not the syntactic representation.

Exactly. It is up to the lexical representation itself to provide
information such as the base used in the representation. Such
distinctions which are only relevant to representation should not
be tied to the identity of the data type itself. "Hexidecimal encoded
integer" is not a data type.

Please see my recent posting providing examples of this using Scheme
representations.

Cheers,

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 5 November 2001 03:31:20 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:29 EDT