W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2001

Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-sem antics

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 12:56:04 +0100
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010514125254.00a184e0@joy.songbird.com>
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Aaron,

I acknowledge that the RFC2396 definition doesn't specifically limit an 
entity to being a "bag of bits".  For the purpose of the current debate, 
that didn't seem to be the key issue ...  what I was trying to emphasize 
was the distinction between the "conceptual mapping" and the things denoted 
by that mapping.  I.e. that resource != entity.

#g
--

At 01:56 PM 5/11/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> wrote:
>
> > I thought the URI spec was fairly clear that:
> >
> > (a) a resource is a "conceptual mapping"
> >
> > (b) an entity is a "bag of bits"
>
>Actually, the URI spec says:
>
><q cite="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt"
>          The resource is the conceptual mapping to an entity or set of
>          entities, not necessarily the entity which corresponds to that
>          mapping at any particular instance in time.
></q>
>
>To me that seems to indicate that an entity can be more than a bag of bits.
>The HTTP spec, however, seems to use this narrower definition of a "network
>entity".
>
><q cite="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt">
>    entity
>       The information transferred as the payload of a request or
>       response. An entity consists of metainformation in the form of
>       entity-header fields and content in the form of an entity-body, as
>       described in section 7.
></q>
>
>DanC, you may want to link these definitions into the Architecture/Terms
>document for later discussions.
>
>--
>Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|       The Info Network
>   <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |     <http://theinfo.org>
>AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to be
>
>
>
>This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
>MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 14 May 2001 14:35:24 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:35:48 EDT