W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: log:forSome/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:22:06 +0100
To: me@aaronsw.com
Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, connolly@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OF612445DB.67138484-ON41256A7A.00324DDD@bayer-ag.com>


[...]
> I don't think you can really have it both ways. The forSome
> interpretation seems to be pretty standard,

that's what we think as well

> and not exactly
> inconsistent with what we've been calling skolemization.

I'm still not there to see why we should skolemize here

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Friday, 29 June 2001 09:35:54 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Frank Boumphrey: "Regrets"
Previous message: Art Barstow: "F2F priorities"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: log:forSome/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources"
Next in thread: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com: "Re: log:forSome/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:19 EDT