W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: draft partitioning of the issues

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:13:39 +0100
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010628134221.00a17500@joy.songbird.com>
To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 08:51 AM 6/27/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>Who said it had to be this way? The outcome is dependent on the results of 
>the xmllang issue, but I don't believe it's a stretch at all to see:
>
>   _:a <foo:bar> <data:text/plain;lang=en;weekend> .
>   _:a <foo:bar> <data:text/plain;lang=fr;weekend> .
>
>or some other, similar syntax to do the same thing.

I agree that would seem a logical approach, but there can find no ;lang= 
parameter for text/plain [1].

The defined MIME way is to use a Content-language header [2].

#g
--

[1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2046.txt
[2] ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1766.txt


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 09:29:22 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:18 EDT