- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:13:39 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 08:51 AM 6/27/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>Who said it had to be this way? The outcome is dependent on the results of
>the xmllang issue, but I don't believe it's a stretch at all to see:
>
> _:a <foo:bar> <data:text/plain;lang=en;weekend> .
> _:a <foo:bar> <data:text/plain;lang=fr;weekend> .
>
>or some other, similar syntax to do the same thing.
I agree that would seem a logical approach, but there can find no ;lang=
parameter for text/plain [1].
The defined MIME way is to use a Content-language header [2].
#g
--
[1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2046.txt
[2] ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1766.txt
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 09:29:22 UTC