ISSUE: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources

At 07:04 PM 6/26/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>Yesterday we also activated
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources
>
>I think this is more of a semantic question, but it does affect the syntax
>of n-triple.  I'd also like a volunteer to own this one.

I'll volunteer to own this.

Having reviewed the issue, the first question I have to ask is this:

In the current RDF specification (that we are chartered to clarify), is 
this a purely syntactic issue, or does the "model" also allow for anonymous 
resources?

I'll plan to prepare a more comprehensive framework for discussion.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 09:29:18 UTC