Re: RDF core: abstract syntax and semantics - an attempt

On Thursday, June 21, 2001, at 11:17  AM, Graham Klyne wrote:

> Please find attached, for your contemplation, an attempt at 
> defining an abstract syntax AND semantics for an RDF "core" 
> consisting of just ground facts and reifications.

In the attached document, you write:

> At first sight, [an RDF graph] may appear to be simply 'true' 
> or 'false'.  In the absence of reification, this is enough.

Please excuse my naivete, but what does it mean for an RDF graph 
to appear 'true' or 'false'.

Thanks,

--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]