>"R.V.Guha" wrote: > > > > Ok, Aaron, you hit the nail on the head. > > > > RDF absolutely has to make sense even outside the context of > > an enclosing document which can be given a uri. so ... > >So... what? That doesn't make any sense to me. > >An RDF document is an XML document. ?? It is? I thought that RDF was sets of triples and the XML version was just one way to render it into text. Call for clarification: are we supposed to take the XML syntax of RDF as definitive, or the triples model? Pat Hayes --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 18:51:07 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:14 EDT