W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: try 2 - test cases for #rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity, #rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:46:46 -0500
Message-Id: <v04210118b756d7403596@[205.160.76.183]>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>  M&S says:
>
>  For a single collection resource there may be at most one triple
>  whose predicate is any given element of Ord.
>

What does that mean? Suppose there are two such triples, in fact. Is 
that illegal RDF? Inconsistent RDF? Deprecated RDF? Perfectly fine 
RDF, but not interpretable as a container specification? Imply that 
that's not a collection resource after all? Or what?

In general it would be better if these 'voice-of-God' assertions were 
clarified somewhat in the M&S .

Pat Hayes

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 18:46:55 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:14 EDT