W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: try 2 - test cases for #rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity, #rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:46:46 -0500
Message-Id: <v04210118b756d7403596@[]>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>  M&S says:
>  For a single collection resource there may be at most one triple
>  whose predicate is any given element of Ord.

What does that mean? Suppose there are two such triples, in fact. Is 
that illegal RDF? Inconsistent RDF? Deprecated RDF? Perfectly fine 
RDF, but not interpretable as a container specification? Imply that 
that's not a collection resource after all? Or what?

In general it would be better if these 'voice-of-God' assertions were 
clarified somewhat in the M&S .

Pat Hayes

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 18:46:55 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:14 EDT