On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:53:12AM +0100, Brian McBride wrote: > I have updated the test cases and they are now in: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/ WRT #5: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf is the following legal: <rdf:DF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" <rdf:_1/> </rdf:RDF> If so, it would be good to add a test for this special case. WRT #6: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test006.nt why is this triple added to the last sub-case: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test006.rdf#e3> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_1> _:stmt1 . Art ---Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 09:39:03 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:12 EDT