W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: try 2 - test cases for #rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity, #rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:37:55 -0400
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20010619093755.A22485@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:53:12AM +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
> I have updated the test cases and they are now in:
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/

WRT #5:
 
 http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf

is the following legal:

 <rdf:DF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   <rdf:_1/>
 </rdf:RDF>

If so, it would be good to add a test for this special case.

WRT #6:

 http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test006.nt

why is this triple added to the last sub-case:

 <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test006.rdf#e3>
     <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_1> _:stmt1 .

Art
---
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 09:39:03 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:12 EDT