- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:45:33 +0100 (BST)
- To: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
(Don't have an id for this yet) Re: Brian's test cases at: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/ Test 1: fine (although a note that ntriples definition needs expanding to include "\n" and "\r" in WS) Test 2: yes. Test 3: yes, although this is simpler than test 2 (and subsumed there?). Suggest you change foo:Bar in test 2 to a normal bag. Test 4: yes (with a lamentation about the last alternative of production 6.12 again) Test 5: ye-e-es*. I'm not going to quibble about this because it's truly a corner case. Test 6: yes. (the last case is horrific though :-) ) Test 7: yes. Test 8: yes. Error case 1: yep. All looks fine to me (with provisos noted above). jan PS. "Overview.html" needs turning on for the whole world to see -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Prolog in JavaScript: http://tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/~cmjg/logic/prolog-latest
Received on Monday, 18 June 2001 10:45:43 UTC