Folks, guha wrote: > My suggestion is to purge it from the M&S spec > and add an appendix showing how containers > can be implemented on top of the smaller healthier RDF. I think I would be in favor of an approach where we have an "inner" core and an "outer" core, but completely purging the spec seems *very* dangerous. > What does it buy us? Makes the spec simpler, easier > to understand, implement, ... Yes, but it also buys potential non-interoperability, when folks start reinventing their own ways of doing containers etc. I am not against anyone inventing new schemes, just that there ought to be one that's "preferred" to ensure some baseline interoperability. I do not believe that just having triples and nothing else constitutes interoperability. Regards, - Ora (wearing the pragmatist hat today) -- Ora Lassila, mailto:ora.lassila@nokia.com, +1 (781) 993-4603 Research Fellow, Nokia Research Center / BostonReceived on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 09:21:44 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:06 EDT