W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: XML:Base - impact on RDF (first pass)

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:06:51 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 08:19 AM 6/6/01 -0400, Art Barstow wrote:
> > >
> > > Someone, I think it might have been Graham, suggested recently that
> > > attributes in the xml namespace should not generate properties.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> >
> > This looks like it might be a good idea; it occurred to me too and I
> > remember someone mentioning it, but couldn't find the message when I
> > went looking for it.
>Why would it be a good idea to not generate triples
>for these attributes?  It seems like the language should
>have as few execeptions as possible.

I don't remember making the comment, but I can reconstruct some possible 

Attributes (and elements) beginning with xml are already special cases in 
XML.  xml:base and xmlns spring to mind.

By being clear that attributes beginning with xml do not generate triples, 
we avoid the situation that future developments of XML might change the 
output generated for some given document:

   <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=... ...>
     <rdf:Description rdf:about='#foo' xml:fudge='...' />

Absent an interpretation for xml:fudge, it would appear as an RDF attribute 
of the RDF resource #foo.  A subsequent definition of xml:fudge to affect 
XML infoset generation could change that.


Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2001 10:25:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:49 UTC