- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:21:38 +0100
- To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Art Barstow wrote:
> > Another weakness of the original proposal is that it is not clear what
> > tripes to generate for the following case:
> >
> > <rdf:Bag rdf:_1="1", rdf:_2="2"/>
> > <rdf:li>?</rdf:li>
> > </rdf:Bag>
>
> I don't quite understand this issue as the above appears
> to be illegal RDF (even as a typedNode). Are you suggesting
> the grammar be changed to make this legal?
I was in too much of a hurry with my last message.
I think it matches:
[6.13] typedNode ::= '<' typeName idAboutAttr? bagIdAttr? propAttr* '/>'
| '<' typeName idAboutAttr? bagIdAttr? propAttr* '>'
propertyElt* '</' typeName '>'
Brian
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2001 09:23:16 UTC