- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:12:45 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 04:24:59PM +0100, Brian McBride wrote: > > I suggest that rdf:li be disallowed as an attribute. I did a quick scan of my RDF tests and didn't see rdf:li being used as an attribute. Does anyone know of any RDF vocabularies that promote using rdf:li as an attribute? > > Another weakness of the original proposal is that it is not clear what > tripes to generate for the following case: > > <rdf:Bag rdf:_1="1", rdf:_2="2"/> > <rdf:li>?</rdf:li> > </rdf:Bag> I don't quite understand this issue as the above appears to be illegal RDF (even as a typedNode). Are you suggesting the grammar be changed to make this legal? Art ---
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2001 09:13:50 UTC