W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: rdfms-empty-property-elements

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 20:35:41 -0500
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B7453318.D680%aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> test2 of Jan's first set of tests states that in a particular case,
> the object of the statement is a literal, not a resource.
> 
> test2 of Jan's second set of tests is a different case, falls under the rules
> he refered to in his message and I quoted earlier.  Those rules require
> the object of the statement to a resource.  Not to create a resource in this
> case would be a change to the spec.
> 
> test2 of Jan's first message says nothing about the interpretation of test2
> from his second set of tests.  They are different cases.

Yes, you are correct. However, I mentally lumped the issues together, even
though they are discussed separately in the spec. I withdraw my comments.

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2001 21:37:05 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:04 EDT