W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: rdfms-empty-property-elements

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 00:13:53 +0100
Message-ID: <3B1EB931.9ABD7FE@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
CC: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

Aaron Swartz wrote:
> It's documented in the test-cases, specifically test2. 

test2 of Jan's first set of tests states that in a particular case,
the object of the statement is a literal, not a resource.

test2 of Jan's second set of tests is a different case, falls under the rules
he refered to in his message and I quoted earlier.  Those rules require
the object of the statement to a resource.  Not to create a resource in this
case would be a change to the spec.

test2 of Jan's first message says nothing about the interpretation of test2
from his second set of tests.  They are different cases.

Would you agree?

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 19:15:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:49 UTC