W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Paragraph numbers again :-/

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:03:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106071802050.29416-100000@tux.w3.org>


I've bounced these docs to www-archive@w3.org, which is public.

M+S:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part

Schema:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0022/00-part

Dan

On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Jan Grant wrote:

> Model and syntax:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2001Jun/att-0017/01-rdfms.html
>
> Schema:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2001Jun/att-0016/01-schema.html
>
> Apart from demonstrating my complete inability to drive my MUA,
> these can be used to point to individual paragraphs in the documents as
> follows:
>
> (The empty propertyElt paragraphs start here)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2001Jun/att-0017/01-rdfms.html#229
>
> (some contentious words here about cyclic subclasses)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2001Jun/att-0016/01-schema.html#103
>
> They should have the right MIME types etc. now.
>
> I'd recommend that people use these for the RDFcore list if they need to
> point out relevant bits of the documents.
>
> jan
>
> PS. Permanent copies here:
> 	http://ioctl.org/rdf/ms/rdfms
> 	http://ioctl.org/rdf/sch/schema
> - but the W3 archives should probably be preferred.
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2001 18:03:35 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:04 EDT