W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: More on empty property elements, ID/resource and the associated productions.

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:40:52 -0500
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B743FF83.D50F%aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dave B's just pointed this out to me (I lost the coin toss so I get to
> write this :-/ )
> 
> In brief:
> - does anyone out there actually _use_ the last clause of production
> [6.12] in the grammar?

Sometimes I wish this feature of RDF would just go away, but Dave always
insists on bringing it up. ;-) My thoughts:

test1: OK, if we have to. Does anyone feel that this feature is important?
test2: No, I believe this is inconsistent with our new interpretation of
<propElt />. It should be considered an error, in the same way error1 is.
test3: Same as test2.

error1: OK.

-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 16:41:30 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:03 EDT