W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: Proposal: add a terminology document to the M&S

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:47:36 +0100
Message-ID: <3B65F218.17CC08F0@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
CC: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>, dehora@acm.org, RDFCore <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Morning chaps,

M&S already contains a glossary:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part#274

I suggest that places it firmly in scope.

Brian


Ron Daniel wrote:
> 
> Bill DeHora asks:
> 
> > > Are we within the charter to consider merging such a
> [terminology]
> > > document into the
> > > M&S?
> 
> As one of the self-appointed 'charter cops', I'll say
> that I don't believe it violates the spirit of the charter,
> so long as the terms it defines are restricted to those
> used in the M&S and RDF Schema documents (modulo any
> new terms added in the course of clarifying those, such
> as using 'graph' to mean an instance of a 'model').
> 
> Ron
Received on Monday, 30 July 2001 19:50:25 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:19 EDT