W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 21:19:47 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010723211632.03c4c200@joy.songbird.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 06:37 AM 7/23/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>DanC makes concrete a fundamental philosophical point:
>
>   An RDF processor can never know enough about the real world to decide
>   that two anonymous descriptions were intended to describe the same
>   resource.
>
>Thus, if an RDF processor is ever to generate a URI for an anonymous
>resource, it must never use the same URI twice, otherwise it risks
>asserting that two different resources are in fact the same.
>
>The only algorithms that it can use therefore are those that generate
>(probably) unique identifiers each time they are called such as uuidgen.

Brian,

I agree.  This is the complication of requiring unique URIs mentioned 
previously.  I think it's a choice we are coming close to making (one way 
or the other).

#g



------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 18:05:42 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:14 EDT