W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: RDFCore Telecon 2001-07-13 Agenda

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:36:14 +0100
Message-ID: <3B4DD1FE.1F0D0CBC@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: fmanola@mitre.org
CC: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Hi Frank,

I had been hoping to have Danbri around when we discussed this and he
won't be there tomorrow, but you are right - it would be better not
to waste time.

We will make time for this in tomorrow's agenda.

Brian


Frank Manola wrote:
> 
> I'd like to see the agenda explicitly reflect reception of the attached
> message (and referenced paper) and that we have an action item to deal
> with it.
> 
> --Frank
> 
> --
> Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
> 202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
> mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-8752
> 
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Coordination points between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL
> Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 05:33:16 -0400 (EDT)
> Resent-From: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:31:41 +0200
> From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
> Organization: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
> To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> 
> Now that the RDF Core Working group has started its activities, the
> "joint committee" who has designed DAML+OIL has written a document that
> describes which areas of RDF and RDF Schema need attention based on our
> experiences with defining DAML+OIL as an extension of RDF Schema.
> 
> You can find the document at
> http://www.daml.org/2001/07/RDFS-DAML+OIL-coordination.html
> 
> On behalf of the "joint committee",
> 
> Frank van Harmelen.
>                  ----
> Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl              http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh
> Department of AI, Faculty of Sciences,  Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
> de Boelelaan 1081a, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> tel (+31)-20-444 7731 fax&voicemail (+31)-84-8722806
> 
> --------
> 
> Abstract:
> 
> This document describes which areas of RDF and RDF Schema need attention
> based on our experiences with defining DAML+OIL as an extension of RDF
> Schema. It is input from the DAML+OIL Joint Committee to the RDF Core
> working group.
> 
> Contents:
> 
>     what does DAML+OIL depend on from RDF(S)
>         RDF triple structure
>         RDF Schema constructions
>     what does DAML+OIL not use at all
>         reification
>         containers
>         meta-classes
>     what changes does DAML+OIL require in RDF(S)
>         multiple domains with intersection semantics
>         multiple ranges with intersection semantics
>         cycles in subclass- and subproperty-hierarchies
>     what areas of RDF(S) problematic
>         syntax
>         normalisation
>         datatypes
>         scoping
>         layering
>         Syntax of URIs:
>         Semantics of URIs:
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 12:38:49 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:09 EDT