W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: #rdfms-xmllang

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:36:36 +0100
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010711173346.03d5d260@joy.songbird.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:40 AM 7/11/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>FYI, the following can be found in section 6 of M&S:
>
>   The xml:lang attribute may be used as defined by [XML] to associate a
>   language with the property value. There is no specific data model
>   representation for xml:lang (i.e., it adds no triples to the data model);
>   the language of a literal is considered by RDF to be a part of the 
> literal.
>   An application may ignore language tagging of a string. All RDF 
> applications
>   must specify whether or not language tagging in literals is significant;
>   that is, whether or not language is considered when performing string
>   matching or other processing.
>
>at
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part#221

FWIW, I think this is broken and will require some kind of fix (as opposed 
to clarification).  I'm agnostic about the nature of the fix.

The reason I think it is broken is that I think that RDF applications 
cannot be required to operate on anything other than that which appears in 
the "data model".  Thus, I think that if xml:lang MAY be significant then 
it MUST appear in the "data model".

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 13:29:19 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:08 EDT