W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:48:55 -0700
Message-Id: <v04210108b770fe36d639@[130.107.66.237]>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> >>>=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= said:
> >
> > :From: Dave Beckett
> > :
> > :> Should the blankline production have a rhs? I'm guessing
> > :> the rhs should be eoln?
> > :
> > :No, the eoln is in the line production:
> > :
> > :  line::=ws* (comment | blankline | triple) eoln
> >
> > Ahh. Isn't that the same as:
> >
> > line::=ws* (comment | triple )? eoln
>
>So we have at least three equivalent forms, but which one is clearer?
>

Amazing that so much effort can be devoted to how to describe nothing.

Pat Hayes

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2001 14:49:18 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:08 EDT