W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:25:53 +0100
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4202.994771553@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
>>>=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= said:
> 
> :From: Dave Beckett
> :
> :> Should the blankline production have a rhs? I'm guessing
> :> the rhs should be eoln?
> :
> :No, the eoln is in the line production:
> :
> :  line::=ws* (comment | blankline | triple) eoln
> 
> Ahh. Isn't that the same as:
> 
> line::=ws* (comment | triple )? eoln

So we have at least three equivalent forms, but which one is clearer?

Dave
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2001 09:25:53 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:08 EDT