- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 14 Dec 2001 10:54:35 -0600
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
- Cc: Raphael Volz <volz@fzi.de>
More evidence that xml:lang in RDF 1.0 doesn't meet users' needs and shouldn't overly constrain our decision on interpretation of literals... "This encoding is also part of rdf using one of the abbreviated ways of encoding rdf in XML. Unfortunally this is not sufficient. [...] KAON (kaon.semanticweb.org) extends the RDFS metalevel with addtional primitives for representing a (multi-lingual) lexical layer... See http://kaon.semanticweb.org/2001/11/kaon-lexical.rdf The syntax is pretty adhoc, but it could be used as a discussion basis." -- Multilinguality Raphael Volz (Thu, Dec 13 2001) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2001Dec/0109.html Raphael, you may be interested to know that the RDFCore WG has a related issue on its agenda: Issue rdfms-xmllang: Why isn't xml:lang information represented within the RDF data model? http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xmllang -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 11:54:40 UTC