On 2001-12-10 9:10 AM, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > Again, another convincing post from Aaron ... Thanks. I certainly appreciate your reasoned consideration of the issues. >> too? (Reading on it seems you do...) I'm speechless. > Far from it, Aaron :-). Well, temporarily. ;-) > I am not in any hurry to change either RFC 2396 or http, but these things > are not eternal holy writ, and they will either change or be superceded; > minor deviation from them is not necessarily a disaster. It then comes to be > a value judgment whether the fragment thing is minor or not, and the extent > to which it is a deviation that can be lived with or is perhaps positively > desirable. A very good point. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]Received on Monday, 10 December 2001 13:57:57 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:01 EDT