- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:42:18 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> I'm looking at: > > Id: test001.nt,v 1.4 2001/12/03 14:46:44 josderoo Exp > Id: test001.rdf,v 1.4 2001/12/03 14:46:49 josderoo Exp > > I sorta expected to see an entailment test, not just > an example arrangement of properties. > > But as an example/explanation, it looks fine. > > I'm happy to see it approved. > > I'd like to see an entailment test (to show > that the transitive closure of parent is *not* entialed) > added at some point, but it's not critical. that's actually a very good idea will do that -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 10:45:22 UTC