W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2001

Re: comment on agenda item 9 (rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty)

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:42:18 +0100
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OF323D211B.B7DB63C7-ONC1256B1B.005581F6@bayer-ag.com>

> I'm looking at:
>
> Id: test001.nt,v 1.4 2001/12/03 14:46:44 josderoo Exp
> Id: test001.rdf,v 1.4 2001/12/03 14:46:49 josderoo Exp
>
> I sorta expected to see an entailment test, not just
> an example arrangement of properties.
>
> But as an example/explanation, it looks fine.
>
> I'm happy to see it approved.
>
> I'd like to see an entailment test (to show
> that the transitive closure of parent is *not* entialed)
> added at some point, but it's not critical.

that's actually a very good idea
will do that

--

Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 10:45:22 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:01 EDT