Re: comment on agenda item 9 (rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty)

>.......
>   Issue rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty:
>     Is a super/sub-property of a transitive property necessarily transitive?
>
>     e.g. anc is a transitive property
>          par is a sub-property of anc but is not transitive
>          anc-or-unc is a super-property of anc but is not transitive
>
>>>Might be good to explain that 'anc' means 'ancestor' and 'par'
>>>means 'parent' and 'unc' means whatever it does mean (uncle??).
>>>Otherwise, the point of the example is rather opaque.

You are right (perfect guess!), it's better to have those names.
I've updated the files, but currently I have some trouble to put them at
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty/
(and I asked Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> for help)
Have a nice weekend!

--
Jos